Which type of evidence is NOT commonly used to establish child abuse?

Personal opinions of friends are not considered reliable evidence when establishing child abuse. In a legal context, evidence needs to be factual, objective, and verifiable. Personal opinions, while they may provide insight into the child's situation or family dynamics, do not carry the same weight as concrete evidence like medical records, photographs of injuries, or witness testimonies.

Medical records provide professional assessments and documentation of any physical harm suffered by the child. Photographs of injuries serve as visual proof of abuse, capturing evidence at a specific moment in time. Witness testimonies can offer direct observations and experiences that support claims of abuse, making them critical in investigations and legal proceedings. In contrast, personal opinions tend to be subjective and may not contribute significantly to determining the validity of an abuse claim, as they lack the necessary objectivity and direct accountability.